Research Article

Assessment strategies and challenges of teachers in evaluating students during online learning

Hannah Joyce Agtarap 1 , Anna Carmela Januto 1 , Karl Alvin Aglibot 1 , Cathy Mae Toquero 1 *
More Detail
1 College of Education, Mindanao State University, General Santos City, PHILIPPINES* Corresponding Author
Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 4(2), 2024, ep2418, https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14863
Submitted: 09 December 2023, Published: 23 July 2024
OPEN ACCESS   927 Views   738 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Education was forced to modify face-to-face classes into three pedagogical approaches: synchronous, asynchronous, and blended learning, requiring teachers to change the grading system, assessment, and evaluation of student performance. This study aimed to determine the assessment tools, strategies, and challenges that teachers encounter during online learning. The researchers conducted an online and face-to-face survey that consisted of 75 questions to 50 online teachers who were selected through convenience sampling from seven public and private elementary schools. Findings indicate that most teachers apply traditional assessment strategies to evaluate students in online learning. Some online assessment applications like Edpuzzle, Google Classroom, Kahoot, and Quizzes are rarely used to assess student learning. Teachers, however, frequently utilized Facebook and Messenger in delivering assessments. They applied multiple assessment strategies in online learning to accommodate the learning styles of their students. However, data revealed that most teachers have difficulty ensuring the quality of participation, integrating authentic assessment into online learning, and using online assessment applications. It is recommended for teachers to provide their students with balanced assessment, timely communication, constructive feedback, group multimedia projects, appropriate instructional materials, and alternative online tools to enable meaningful learning.
Keywords: COVID-19, social media, applications, assessment strategies, assessment tools, online learning

CITATION (APA)

Agtarap, H. J., Januto, A. C., Aglibot, K. A., & Toquero, C. M. (2024). Assessment strategies and challenges of teachers in evaluating students during online learning. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 4(2), ep2418. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14863

REFERENCES

  1. Afrianto, A. (2016). Using Google Hangouts for teaching English online. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 4(1), 89-96.
  2. Ali, L., Hamid, N. A., & Al Dmour, H. (2021). The shift to online assessment due to COVID-19: An empirical study of university students, behavior and performance in the Region of UAE. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1515
  3. Almahasees, Z., Khaled, M., & Omar. (2021). Faculty and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 6, 638470. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470
  4. Amiri, A., Wang, J., Slater, N., & Visak, V. N. (2021). Enhancement of process modeling and simulation evaluation by deploying a test for assessment and feedback individualisation. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.001
  5. Ancheta, R., & Ancheta, H. (2020). The new normal in education: Challenge to the private basic education institutions in the Philippines? International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 1(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.53378/345960
  6. Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & Del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321-7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
  7. Bentley, K. (2021). Teacher-created assessments during remote learning. Government Technology. https://www.govtech.com/education/k-12/teacher-created-assessments-during-remote-learning.html
  8. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to coronavirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
  9. Butler, M. (2015). Measures of student engagement in computer science. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 242-247). ACM.
  10. Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Reshaping assessment practices in a Philippine teacher education institution during the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0079. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8535
  11. Cerezo, R., Bogarín, A., Esteban, M., & Romero, C. (2020). Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(1), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09225-y
  12. Chetri, R., & Pokherl, S. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. SAGE Journal, 8(1), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
  13. Cockett, A., & Jackson, C. (2018). The use of assessment rubrics to enhance feedback in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 69, 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.022
  14. Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49, 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
  15. Dayagbil, F. T., Palompon, D. R., Garcia, L. L., & Olvido, M. M. J. (2021). Teaching and learning continuity amid and beyond the pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 6, 678692. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.678692
  16. Doucet, A., Netolicky, D., Timmers, K., & Tuscano, F. J. (2020). Thinking about pedagogy in an unfolding pandemic. UNESCO.
  17. Ekici, D. I. (2017). The use of Edmodo in creating an online learning community of practice for learning to teach science. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 91-106.
  18. Farhan, M., Aslam, M., Jabbar, S., Khalid, S., & Kim, M. (2017). Real-time imaging-based assessment model for improving teaching performance and student experience in elearning. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 13(3), 491-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11554-016-0662-3
  19. Fernandez, J. M., Santos, G. L. M., & Javier, W. C. (2018). An assessment of e-learning system for instructors and students of Panpacific University. Asian Higher Education Chronicles, 1(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.9744/ahec.1.1.63-70
  20. Flaherty, C. (2020). Inside higher education. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/04/21/early-journalsubmission-data-suggest-covid-19-tanking-womens-researchproductivity
  21. Gegenfurtner, A., & Ebner, C. (2019). Webinars in higher education and professional training: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Educational Research Review, 28, 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100293
  22. Guangul, F. M., Suhail, A. H., Khalit, M. I., & Khidhir, B. A. (2020). Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: A case study of Middle East College. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32, 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09340-w
  23. Gyimah, N. (2020). Assessing technological innovation on education in the world of coronavirus (COVID-19). Annal Immunology & Immunotherapy, 4(1), 000158. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3670389
  24. Hattami, A. (2020). E-assessment of students’ performance during the e-teaching and learning. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(8), 1537-1547.
  25. Hodges, C. B., & Barbour, M. K. (2021). Assessing learning during emergency remote education. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1208
  26. Hsiao, Y. P., & Watering, G. A. (2020). Guide for choosing a suitable method for remote assessment considerations and options. https://www.utwente.nl/.uc/ffaea9b660102d86e5500968eb70138724d87765be38900/Guide%20for%20choosing%20a%20suitable%20method%20for%20remote%20assessment.pdf
  27. Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., & Abidi, S. M. R. (2018). Student engagement predictions in an e-learning system and their impact on student course assessment scores. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2018, 6347186. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6347186
  28. Jacques, S., Ouahabi, A., & Lequeu, T. (2020). Remote knowledge acquisition and assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 10(6), 120-138. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i6.16205
  29. Jankowski, N. A. (2020). Assessment during a crisis: Responding to a global pandemic. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
  30. Joaquin, J. J. B., Biana, H. T., & Dacela, M. A. (2020). The Philippine higher education sector in the time of COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 5, 576371. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.576371
  31. Kaup, S., Jain, R., Shivalli, S., Pandey, S., & Kaup, S. (2020). Sustaining academics during COVID-19 pandemic: The role of online teaching-learning. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 68(6), 12201221. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1241_20
  32. Kearns, L. R. (2012). Student assessment in online learning: Challenges and effective practices. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400639401.ch-004
  33. Kinoti, T. (2020). COVID-19 adaptation: Challenges in assessing learning in marginalized communities. Humanitarian Education Accelerator. https://www.ukfiet.org/2020/covid-19-adaptations-challengesin-assessinglearning-in-marginalised-communities/
  34. Lee, J. M., Jo, E. B., Li, H. Y., & Rha, J. Y. (2017). A study on university students’ use and assesment with digital devices and services for realizing smart campus. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(7), 27-39.
  35. Lieser, P., Taff, S. D., & Murphy-Hagan, A. (2018). The webinar integration tool: A framework for promoting active learning in blended environments. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2018(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.453
  36. Nars, N. (2020). Teachers as students: Adapting to online methods of instruction and assessment in the age of COVID-19. Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(2), 168-171.
  37. Noor, S., Isa, F., & Mazhar, F. F. (2020). Online teaching practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Process: International Journal, 9(3), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2020.93.4
  38. Permana, P., & Permatawati, I. (2020, March). Using Quizizz as a formative assessment tool in German classrooms. In 3rd International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2019) (pp. 155-159). Atlantis Press.
  39. Quiamco, M. S., Abocado, S. M., & Toquero, C. M. (2022). Zoom engagement of pre-service teachers during emergency remote classes. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17(2).
  40. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. In Y. Punie (Ed.), EUR 28775 EN. Publications Office of the European Union.
  41. Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 23140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500063819
  42. Sit, S. M., & Brudzinski, M. R. (2017). Creation and assessment of an active e-learning introductory geology course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(6), 629-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9703-3
  43. Tadesse, S., & Muluye, W. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on education system in developing countries: A review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 159-170. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.810011
  44. Toquero, C. M. D. (2021a). Academic silver linings in a Philippine State University amid the early stages of pandemic cases. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(2), 448-455. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v8i2.498
  45. Toquero, C. M. D. (2021b). Digital ethnography on students’ authentic engagement in social media platforms during the global online experiment. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 1(1), ep2104. https://doi.org/10.21601/jdet/11310
  46. Toquero, C. M. D., & Talidong, K. J. (2020). Webinar technology: Developing teacher training programs for emergency remote teaching amid COVID-19. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(3), 2-5. https://doi.org/10.30476/ijvlms.2020.86889.1044
  47. Vordos, N., Gkika, D. A., Maliaris, G., Tilkeridis, K. E., Antoniou, A., Bandekas, D. V., & Mitropoulos, A. C. (2020). How 3D printing and social media tackles the PPE shortage during COVID-19 pandemic. Safety Science, 130, 104870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104870
  48. Winthrop, R. (2020). Top-10 risks and opportunities for education in the face of COVID-19. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus-development/2020/04/10/top-10risks-and-opportunities-for-education-inthe-face-of-covid-19
  49. Zayapragassarazan, Z. (2020). COVID-19: Strategies for engaging remote learners in medical education. Online Submission, 9(273), 1-18.