Research Article

Assessing language proficiency in the digital age: Exploring innovative methods for assessment and feedback in ESL classrooms

Melissa Özlem Grab 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Education, Giresun University, Giresun, TURKEY* Corresponding Author
Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(2), July 2025, ep2510, https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/16286
Submitted: 26 December 2024, Published Online: 22 April 2025, Published: 01 July 2025
OPEN ACCESS   47 Views   38 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study explored the effectiveness of innovative digital tools for assessing language proficiency and providing feedback in ESL settings. The study employed a mixed-method design, with quantitative data from pre- and post-tests, while qualitative data were obtained through interviews and classroom observation. It has involved 60 ESL students in the current study and exposed them to some digital assessment tools through a six-week trial, while qualitatively it interviews 15 students and 6 ESL teachers about their experiences regarding the digital assessment tools. The quantitative test results showed that the sets of language proficiency improved more significantly. More importantly, the survey data indicated that the majority of the students found the digital tools to be easy to use and helpful to learn from, especially in terms of immediate feedback. This was followed by individual positive experiences about personalized feedback and the growing enthusiasm of students in using digital assessment, amidst difficulties experienced due to technical glitches or probable problems in adapting. The study concluded that digital tools effectively improved the language proficiency of ESL learners while making the process of feedback not cumbersome.
Keywords: language proficiency, digital assessment, ESL, feedback

CITATION (APA)

Grab, M. Ö. (2025). Assessing language proficiency in the digital age: Exploring innovative methods for assessment and feedback in ESL classrooms. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(2), ep2510. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/16286

REFERENCES

  1. Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. A&C Black.
  2. Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. ASCD.
  5. Chapelle, C. A., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for teaching with CALL: Practical approaches to computer-assisted language learning. Pearson Education.
  6. Chappuis, S., & Chappuis, J. (2007). The best value in formative assessment. Informative Assessment, 65(4), 14–19.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
  9. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw Hill.
  10. Deterding, S. (2012). Gamification: Designing for motivation. Interactions, 19(4), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212883
  11. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  12. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
  13. Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054
  14. Gardner, R. C. (2004). Attitude/motivation test battery: International AMTB research project. The University of Western Ontario. https://publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/docs/englishamtb.pdf
  15. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
  16. Green, A. (2010). Exploring language assessment and testing: Language in action. Routledge.
  17. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
  18. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  19. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
  20. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
  21. Li, M., & De Luca, R. (2014). Review of assessment feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709494
  22. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22, 5–55.
  23. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  24. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
  25. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Chapter II: Changing conceptions of learning: A century of progress in the scientific study of education. Teachers College Record, 103(7), 34–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810110300702
  26. Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. SAGE.
  27. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
  28. Murray, D. E., & Christison, M. A. (2019). What English language teachers need to know volume I: Understanding learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351139847
  29. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Longman.
  30. Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. In B. S. Everitt, & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa514
  31. Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child. Harvard University Press.
  32. Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474235952
  33. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
  34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  35. Warschauer, M. (2010). Learning to write in the laptop classroom. Writing & Pedagogy, 1(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v1i1.101
  36. Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Ernst Klett Sprachen. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997
  37. Yin, R. K. C. (2018). Study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE.